Poem 2 - "Birth Pangs"



Birth Pangs
Avigayil Rosensweig


Would it have been better, if you had never been—
Had you been stillborn, half-hoped
phoenix that never rose from
ashes so thick they choked the ground:
charred bits of one
one after another wooden synagogue

I was not there to pace the corridors at your birth,
but I remember the first time I
gathered your infant self in my arms
and felt your trembling vitality.
They wrapped you in a blanket:
blue and white, like a prayer shawl.

I remember your profile, distant against the horizon:
all scarlet plumage and gleaming talons,
terrible and beautiful against the night sky,
as distant as the celestial bodies
which painted the heavens around your wings.
Born of ashes, but incandescent as flame.

And I could never tell which one you were:
mythical creature or natural born child.
Sometimes I look sideways at you
and fear you will disappear,
soar into the heavens
with great wing-flaps which beat down the very wind.

I duck my head into your cradle
to hear the whisper of your breathing,
watch your chest rise and fall.
Reassurance that life exists
In so small a vessel.

Birth pangs of redemption heralded your coming:
a drawn-out labor.
Your first cry shook the earth.
Or else you exploded in a blaze of fire:
fierce war bird,
sleek and predatory,
even your fledgling wings battle-ready.

I saw you spread your wings—
sun-limned, they looked like fire,
each feather a flame,
felt you curl your every tiny finger
around just one of my own.

I heard them greet the Sabbath every week,
their singing sweet as a lullaby,
and I heard their voices rise on Independence Day,
prayers joyful as birdsong.

We still have the blanket, somewhere,
threads loose at the edges,
less blindingly white than when they first
wrapped it around your wrinkled form,
but the blue dye held beneath
spatterings of brown.
And even so—
even if blue and white were stained with blood
and dragged through mud,
Would it really have been better—?

Comments

  1. I loved the way you made the reader figure out that this poem wasn't really about a child being born but the state of Israel coming into existence symbolized by the Israeli flag. I am slightly confused with the last few lines where you say "and even so--- even if blue and white were stained with blood and dragged through mud, would it really have been better--" the couple lines before you had been expressing Israel's plight to stay alive by saying "wrinkled body" but the last couple lines have me confused. I don't think your'e saying we shouldn't be appreciative of Israel's strength within its plight but the last couple lines make it seem that way. You used amazing language and I loved your off rhymes throughout the poem. I also think you organized it in the best way possible. I think there a couple of words that could be taken out like "And even so" could just be "Even so" --I don't see the need for the word "and". I really loved the line "I saw you.. they looked like fire". Overall great job!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is a great poem! I love how you managed to continue with both metaphors throughout the entire poem - of the phoenix and the stillborn - really quite impressive. I think that the last line of the first stanza, "one after another wooden synagogue." is a little oddly phrased and cumbersome to read but other than that, this is really beautiful.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really enjoyed this poem. At first i found it confusing having both the infant and the phoenix metaphors but at the same time, i really loved it. In the second to last stanza, you say "them" when i feel it should continue with the "you?" I love the different metaphors and descriptive language you use, it really brings the poem alive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "You" in the poem is supposed to be Israel (as an entity). "They" are groups of individuals within the state (i.e. different communities during Friday night prayers, religious-Zionist celebrations--I had Mercaz HaRav in mind--on Independence Day)
      They are within the state, as opposed to being the state.

      I'll try out what it looks like replaced with "you"--subsuming the individuals within the state--i.e. the citizens are the state--but I'm not sure if the imagery will work of the baby singing a lullaby to itself...and for the Independence Day one, the citizens are celebrating the state, so I still might want to retain the imagery--in both cases--of an outside entity singing to/near/about/around the baby/phoenix

      Delete
  4. Yay angsty Zionist poems! This is a particularly skillful one, though :P The juxtaposition of the imagery of birth pangs and the rise of a Phoenix from ashes is an interesting one and I like the product. My suggestion would be to omit the first stanza-- you can trust your readers to figure out what you're describing and it would come out much more poetic if you let us have it instead of telling us. But I would insert the line "charred bits of one after another wooden synagogue."-- that was really beautiful and could be put somewhere else. I can't wait to read more!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I loved the extended metaphor here. That is, a child representing the birth of a nation. This mixed with the phoenix image made for a nice overall effect. In general, I think "phoenix rising from ashes" is a bit overdone, but you managed to bring something new here. I especially love the way you ended with the image of the blanket. I also did not think the zionism was that apparent here. It could be interpreted in different ways.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Okay first of all, snaps for an exceedingly creative Zionist poem (and snaps for not outright mentioning tears at the Kotel and other such tropes). I wanted to clarify- you mention a stillborn child and then one that grows and thrives. Is the stillborn early failed attempts as settling the land? Am I misinterpreting? Are they old Europe which gives painful way to Israel? Could use some clarification.
    Overall, gorgeous imagery and strikingly poignant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, the syntax is not so clear there. The first stanza supposed to be asking a question--Would it have been better if you had never been--i.e. would it have been better if the child was stillborn, if the phoenix never rose from the ashes...then the rest of the body of the poem describes the phoenix/child, then the last stanza returns to the question. (The "would it really have been better--" is circling back to the question of "would it have been better if you had never been")

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Poem 1 - "The Face of God"

Poem(s)14 - Six Haikus